To the
Editor:
In
relation to “The Quest for Proof of Out-of-Body Experiences and Allied
Phenomena” by Michael Gross, Vol. 7, No. 28, April 2005, JOURNAL OF
CONSCIENTIOLOGY.
Nearly
three years after learning about the subject, a friend of mine had his primo-projection. This occurred only three days after
expressing interest in having a first-hand experience in a more resolute way. I
had mentioned to P.M. that several of my out-of-body experiences have taken
place on mornings that were preceded by incomplete sleep, a couple of hours of
activity, and then a return to the mattress. On this occasion, an early-morning
appointment was cancelled and having slept only a few hours, P.M. decided to
relax and attempt conscious projection. It did not take long before he achieved
the vibrational state, followed by a sinking
sensation before take-off.
He
described a partial projection where the left arm was raised as his torso
lifted and turned to the right side. Although short-lived, this experience was
of continuous consciousness and very distinct
from his past dream-like experiences.
For two
consecutive nights, we discussed ideas, which was unplanned and very
uncharacteristic. The first night, P.M.
challenged the consciential paradigm by invoking apparent personality changes
manifested after removal of the corpus callosum that links the right and left cerebral
“hemispheres.” It was after this point was refuted that the desire to project
was articulated as the only way to investigate the matter.
The
second night, I pondered: "How do we promote the lucid projectability or primo-projection of a person who is
interested in having a first-hand experience?" At the time, I was also
preoccupied with "What is the most effective means to engage the
critical mass of conscientially-aware
I
happened to have a copy of issue 28 of the Journal of Conscientiology, and at
some point I read the question posed by Michael Gross (Scotland): why is it we
do not have more OBE's and why is it so hard for us
to obtain empirical evidence regarding the OBE? It was precisely after reading
this question that I received strong energetic signals, and it was upon leafing
through the remaining journal and reaching the "Proyeccion
Assistential" personal account that I pieced
these ideas together.
The
concept that emerged the night before P.M.’s
primo-projection is a Joint Assisted-Assistential
Projection self-development, altruism, and research program. The group can be comprised of volunteers at a
C.I. or the more emotionally-stable, minimally-trained, trust-worthy, and
motivated-active members of an community like the Science of Self Club in
Gainesville, FL. Participants can increase rapport with the extraphysical team
and their assistantial mental targets by volunteering
at a hospice (alternatively, at an orphanage, prison, mental institution, or
other place with people in need of compassion and energetic assistance).
Utilizing
a beta version of Gabe Sereni's
online journal system (presented in the 2005 Symposium of Conscientiological
Research) and a well-thought-out protocol, the group can document experiences
individually and then extract scientific information through posterior
corroboration of subjective experiences-observations and objective facts.
Groups
in different locations could do the same in parallel resulting in more
assistance and more data for the investigation.
It is
an intelligent way to synthesize objectives:
- training of situation-critical energetic control (donation,
rapport, self-defense)
- development and evaluation of scientific protocols for projectiological research
- verbaction of maxi-fraternity:
diurnal consolation task (compassion) and nocturnal clarification task
- accumulation of extraphysical experiences and empirical
evidence
- polykarma, universalism: the
terminally-ill patients will be 'strangers'
-
employs and therefore serves as a validation/refutation of existing projectiological knowledge: theories/hypotheses regarding
mental targets, assisted and assistantial
projections, bioenergetic rapport, etc.
For the
open-minded with little to no projective experience, it may be influential to
increasingly predispose them to first projections and empirical evidence of
multidimensionality and its ramifications. For those who have previously had
lucid projections before, it is a way to accelerate multidimensional
activity during the (as I understand) most in-demand task for projectors: as
assistants to Helpers in the lessening of trauma of the process of desoma (first and second).
If we
truly desire to be a part of this assistantial
mechanism, then we should make material efforts during the day (e.g. hospice
work) allied with intention and availability during the night. In due time, we
will recall bits and pieces as our maturity and the type of work allow. If we
periodically meet in groups in the physical plane, we should increase our
probability of meeting extraphysically at the mental
target on set dates.
While
some folks might like to join such a project for selfish reasons, it is foolish
as you cannot fool a helper. Above all, it is unlikely that one can participate
without genuine fraternity or compassion to make the time commitment and to
bear the eventual unpleasant holothosenes and sights
of the places where there is need. This is more than offset by the fulfillment
of assistance, working along side extraphysical colleagues (specialist helpers)
who provide integral support – including restorative post-projective energetic
showers.
Although I have
had a persuasive string of synchronicities regarding this type of target, I
would like to note that there are alternative mental targets that follow a
similar logic with similar benefit, such as: other total institutions like a prison,
a hospital, an orphanage, or a mental institution; specific projectiological
science or self-development inquiries (eg.:
brain-parabrain connection/architecture; energetic
signals; research of certain aspects of bioenergy; psychosoma; extraphysical dimensions; groupkarma;
etc.).
This
approach is reminiscent of a group project conducted in
We can
also observe that the extraphysical teams invest more on group experiments that
last several days and that are carried out consistently
and reliably in a continuous or at least period fashion (e.g.: Projective Field
experiment). Consciential laboratories – a single location that is frequently
used for the same purpose – enjoy extensive support, as well. Realizing this,
IAC researchers have designed and are set to build, with the financial support
of people like you, the first projectarium on Earth in the Evoramonte,
Portugal campus (see Vol. 5, No. 17).
It is
important to realize that although this facility will allow the kind of
attention-getting research (that looks at whether or not a phenomenon exists)
it goes further by testing conditions, subjective characteristics, and effects
of the phenomenon. It will inevitably because a center of assistance as well. Through
an increasingly strong self-perpetrating holothosene;
assistential intentionality; extraphysical para-technological refinement; and patient repetition of
experiments, akin to the 27-year program of Princeton Engineering Anomalies
Research laboratory, results of irregular replicability
can aggregate to relevant significance. Out with the old, impatient paradigm
with its arbitrary rules and expectations of replicability;
in with consciential paradigm of consistent experimentation and attention to bioenergy and subjective variables (e.g. will).
Feedback
will be most appreciated.
Nelson Abreu
Fort
Lauderdale, Florida, USA
The above letter was
published in the J. of Conscientiology, Number 30
Addendum
(September 2006): Additional support for these ideas comes from the results of an remote perception OBE study at the